Environment

June 25, 2008

Supreme Court Reduces Punitive Damages to 1/10th of What the Jury Thought Was Fair for the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill

Cross posted from The Pop Tort by Amanda

Right now the folks at Exxon Mobile are probably writing out their 'Thank You' cards to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.  Even though the company posted a "disappointing" $10.9 billion profit in the first quarter of 2008 (the second highest U.S. corporate profit ever – the highest being themselves in 2007) the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that the company only has to pay $500 million (nope, I didn't forget a zero) in punitive damages to the 30,000 victims of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.

Okay, so in 1994, when a jury in Alaska awarded the victims $5 billion, the punitive damages award really might have punished the company for causing this disaster.  In 1994, $5 billion represented a year's profits for the oil company.  In 2006, the award was cut down to $2.5 billion and only represented "about three weeks of Exxon's current [2006] net profits."  So, the current $500 million damage award is what?  Well, according to the New York Times, Exxon Mobile earned more than $1,287 of profit for every second of 2007.

At that rate, it only took them four and a half days to pay off this court's punitive damages judgment.

May 05, 2008

Midwest EPA Official Ousted for Fighting to Protect People and Wildlife

The Chicago Tribune ran this story late last week of Mary Gade, the regional administrator for the  midwest for the US Environmental Protection Agency, detailing how she was forced out of her position because of her willingness to take on manufacturing giant Dow Chemical.  Gade has been rightfully tough on Dow for dumping chemicals leading to high levesl of Dioxin, which has been linked to cancer, infertility, and other serious illnesses and death, in areas as far as 50 miles from their Midland, MI plant.  The concentrations in some areas are thousands of times higher than the amounts the federal government requires to be cleaned up.  She has been fighting this battle with Dow to clean up there mess, while they have been maneuvering politically to avoid any costly cleanup. 

It is a sad state when a person is forced out because she is doing what is required by law and human decency. 

CJ&D recently released a white paper, Corporate Empowerment and the Decline of Public Safety, which looks at how the corporate take-over of federal agencies, including the EPA, and preemption of legal rights has hurt the public health and safety. (Membership required)

April 29, 2008

Oil companies paying up

A suit in downstate Hartford is causing two oil companies to compensate residents who had to face serious health risks from leaking gas fumes.

Hartford residents have complained for years about hydrocarbon vapors that make them feel ill and wreck property values. Experts think the underground pool has been accumulating for more than 75 years.

The companies are supposedly working with the EPA to keep the toxic vapors out of people's homes, but obviously it is still a problem.  It often takes settlements like this one to get companies to really clean up their act, so let's hope that's the case here.

To read more about how the civil justice system protects consumers and the environment, go to the CJ&D report, “How the civil justice system protects environmental health”

April 22, 2008

Earth Day, Environmentalism and the Civil Justice System

Today is Earth Day 2008!  On Earth Day, we are bombarded by messages that talk about the need to protect and conserve our planet. We hear about groups of school children starting recycling programs in their communities, or new technologies that create less pollution or assists us with cleaning up old problems.  What you don't usually hear about is one of the most effective tools we have in this country to protect our environment: The Civil Justice System. 

A report released earlier this year, by The Center for Justice & Democracy, details many situations where private citizens brought civil cases and made polluters clean up their mess.  One of the cases highlighted is the "Love Canal" case:

In the early 1970's, a young mother named Lois Gibbs became concerned by her children's recurring illnesses, including rashes, respiratory difficulties and a serious blood disorder.  She began talking to her neighbors about it, and her informal survey suggested that there were a high number of babies with birth defects in homes near Love Canal on the outskirts of the City of Niagara Falls, New York. This spurred the State Department of Health to study the area.

Between 1942 and 1952, Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp. buried more than 21,000 tons of hazardous chemical wastes in a 3,000-feet long trough called Love Canal.  Over the next 20 years, chemicals from the site seeped into people's basements, contaminating underground sewer pipes and soil, and polluting the indoor air. The Department found an unusually high number of miscarriages among women living near Love Canal, and an elevated number of birth defects - including cleft palate, deformed ears and teeth, and other significant abnormalities. Approximately 950 families were evacuated from a 10-square block surrounding the landfill.

By February 1982, more than 600 personal injury cases had been filed against Hooker (which was bought by Occidental Chemical Co.).  In January 1985, 1,336 residents agreed to a $20 million settlement with Occidental that established a $1 million medical trust fund.  Thirteen years later, the last of the Love Canal cases brought by 899 victims settled for $6.75 million.8 Funds from the settlements have helped pay medical expenses of former Love Canal residents who have illnesses that have been linked to the contamination.

This case spurred passage of the Comprehensive Environmental Remediation, Liability and Compensation Act (CERCLA), also known as “the Superfund law,” which mandates cleanup of toxic sites.  In March 2004, the federal EPA declared cleanup at the site complete, despite lingering concerns of some community leaders, and removed Love Canal from the “Superfund list” of hazardous waste sites.

Citations Omitted.  Click here to view full report.

Because of cases like Love Canal, and others, many individuals have gotten justice and redress.  However, these cases not only benefit them, but benefit all of us.  While the civil courts have been a major tool in the fight for environmental justice and accountably it is under attack by the organizations that commit much of the harm: Big Business.

Big Business and their "tort reform" movement has taken aim at the civil justice system, to limit the access to justice for millions of Americans.  Not only have they tried to limit access, but through lobbying efforts they have tried (and succeeded) in passing legislation that limits their liability (and accountability) when they do harm.  We need to send a clear message to our legislators that we need open access to our civil courts to hold wrongdoers accountable for their misdeeds. 

On this Earth Day let us remember how, among many other tools, the Civil Justice System has helped protect people and the environment. 

In the Fight Against Global Warming: Courts

A new Spotlight on Justice, from the Center for Justice & Democracy, highlights some of the recent court cases that are helping in the fight against global warming.

Soj_globalwarming08_2













click here for a pdf version



Just another example of how courts can help protect us all.  Happy Earth Day!

December 07, 2007

Madigan sues EPA

If you haven't heard, Lisa Madigan, along with 11 other Attorney Generals, has filed suit to force greater disclosure of toxic chemicals that companies store, use, and release into the environment.  The EPA rolled back a regulation that required companies emitting 500-4,999 pounds of specific toxins to file a long detailed report.  This longer report allowed people to see what is being released into their communities. 

Hopefully this suit will be successful and prevent polluters from hiding.

December 05, 2007

New report examines how the civil justice system helps protect the environment

CJ&D released a new report today examining how the civil justice system helps protect the environment and holds polluters accountable.  Below is a summary of the report.

_______________________________________________________________

HOW THE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM PROTECTS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH

For generations, our government has been involved in controlling pollution.  However, political forces can undermine the effectiveness of these laws or impair the regulatory system.  That is why we need the vital protection provided by our civil justice system, according to How the Civil Justice System Protects Environmental Health.

The report examines a variety of issues, including why everyone should have the right to take action in court when their own health and the welfare of their own communities are at stake, and polluters should be held accountable for the harm they cause to ordinary people.  It also addresses how minority communities disproportionately shoulder environmental burdens and often have very few remedies so laws that limit access to mass torts or class actions remedies erect yet another unfair barrier for these communities in their effort to achieve environmental justice.  And environmental lawsuits can play a critical role in preventing global warming, especially when government fails to help remedy this global crisis.

More specifically, while environmental laws passed by legislatures can help control or stop pollution problems,

  • Most of these laws do not provide a way for people to be compensated when they are harmed by pollution.
  • Standards are often not strict enough to prevent harm, and fines imposed for violations of laws in many instances are simply not high enough to force a company to stop harmful but financially lucrative conduct.
  • Political forces have undermined the effectiveness of many laws or have impaired the entire regulatory system.

Citizens need the right to take direct action in court when their own health and the welfare of their own communities are at stake.  Lawsuits by those who have suffered harm from pollution allow the injured person to:

  • Confront the polluter in court and hold them directly accountable.
  • Demand documents from the polluter, in a legal process called “discovery.”
  • Obtain compensation for health impacts and property damage from pollution.
  • Deter future egregious conduct.

Some famous cases have involved tort actions against polluters, including

  • Love Canal 
  • PG&E (“the Erin Brockovich case”)
  • Exxon Valdez Oil Spill
  • The Woburn Case (portrayed in the film, A Civil Action)

Certain corporations have lobbied government to limit or deny the right of ordinary people to take court action, and some rights under the civil justice system have already been impaired.  This includes in the important areas of mass torts and class actions, which allows many cases to be joined together.  Polluters benefit when government restricts the ability of injured people to bring actions in court.

To view the full report, please visit CJ&D's website www.centerjd.org.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search

  • Google Search
    Google

    WWW
    illinoisdeservesthetruth.org

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Add to My AOL

  • Economic  Activism Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

  • All opinions expressed on this blog are those of the authors only. Any disputes should be addressed to the authors or commentators. Illinois Deserves the Truth invites comment to further the debate on issues addressed, but we reserve the right to deny or remove any post or comment.
Blog powered by TypePad