July 08, 2008

Justice for St. Louis Sex Abuse Victims

Yesterday marked another important day for victims of clergy abuse.  The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis settled a lawsuit with six men who were molested by priests as children.  This settlement is the only kind of accountability the victims may see, since no criminal charges have been filed.

Let’s hope more victims keep using this system to seek justice, because the more these dioceses have to deal with financial settlements and bad public exposure, the greater incentive they will have to prevent future abuses.

July 07, 2008

Elder Abuse Awareness Month

Most people understand that elder abuse is a huge problem in Illinois.  Still, you can't help but feel stunned when you learn tragic stories like that of 77-year-old Ivory Jackson, who was beaten to death at his nursing home.  Events like this constantly remind us that we need to do more to protect nursing home residents from harm.  That's why Gov. Blagojevich's proclamation of July as "Elder Abuse Awareness Month"--just a few days after Mr. Jackson died--felt especially relevant to the times.

“Our seniors have the right to be treated with dignity, respect, and to feel safe and secure.  Unfortunately, many seniors find themselves victims of abuse and neglect which is unacceptable,” said Gov. Blagojevich.  “The sooner we know about a case of abuse, the sooner we can put a stop to it.  But in order to keep up the fight against abuse and neglect, we need everyone to do their part.  If you suspect a case of elder abuse report it.  Elder Abuse prevention will help keep thousands of seniors safe each year.”

Click here to learn more about the proclamation, which is part of the state's "Break the Silence" campaign.

Awareness efforts like this are crucial, but reporting abuse isn’t the only way to keep residents safe.  We need to make sure our loved ones and their families can have their day in court and hold abusers accountable for wrongdoing.  Our lawmakers can take a big step forward on this front by passing The Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act in the House (H.R. 6126) and Senate (S. 2838).  Nursing homes increasingly rely on binding, mandatory arbitration hearings to take away the legal rights of abuse victims. This legislation would give victims back their rights and would hold abusers accountable to their victims.

July 03, 2008

Happy 4th of July!

Cross posted from ThePopTort by John Guyette

Dc_fireworks As many of us here at the Pop Tort (and Illinois Deserves the Truth)are preparing for our long weekend of patriotic fun – fireworks, hamburgers, hotdogs and red and blue Jell-o with whipped cream (of course!) one can't help but be reminded about one of the biggest struggles our founding fathers went through in creating the U.S. Constitution – right to a jury in a civil trial

On September 12, 1787, as the [Constitutional] Convention was in its final stages, Mr. Williamson of North Carolina "observed to the House that no provision was yet made for juries in Civil cases and suggested the necessity of it." The comment elicited some support and the further observation that because of the diversity of practice in civil trials in the States it would be impossible to draft a suitable provision. When on September 15 it was moved that a clause be inserted in Article III, § 2, to guarantee that "a trial by jury shall be preserved as usual in civil cases," this objection seems to have been the only one urged in opposition and the motion was defeated. The omission, however, was cited by many opponents of ratification and "was pressed with an urgency and zeal . . . well–nigh preventing its ratification." A guarantee of right to jury in civil cases was one of the amendments urged on Congress by the ratifying conventions and it was included from the first among Madison's proposals to the House. It does not appear that the text of the proposed amendment or its meaning was debated during its passage. 

Betsyross But of course we do know it made it into the Bill of Rights as our Seventh Amendment.  So maybe this Fourth of July the insurance companies, manufacturers of dangerous products and chemicals, the tobacco industry and other major corporate interests who have been engaging in their campaigns to weaken our civil justice system might take a moment while everything is draped in red, white and blue and think about how important that civil justice system really is.

July 02, 2008

Abu Ghraib Torture Victims Sue Military Contractors in U.S. Courts

Cross posted from ThePopTort by Amanda

Abu_ghraib_10 Many of us were shocked and appalled by the photographs of the prisoner abuses occurring in Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison between 2003-2004.  Several military and Congressional investigations were started and eventually nine U.S. soldiers were found guilty of abuse.  This scandal changed the way prisoners were detained in Iraq.

However, none of the private contractors were ever charged with any of the crimes that occurred at Abu Ghraib.  Yesterday, four men filed lawsuits against two U.S. defense contractors.

The lawsuits allege that those arrested and taken to the prison were subjected to forced nudity, electrical shocks, mock executions and other inhumane treatment. They seek unspecified payments high enough to compensate the detainees for their injuries, and to deter contractors from such conduct in the future.

In 2001, the Center for Justice & Democracy released a Primer on War, Terrorism and the U.S. Civil Justice System.  According to one of the co-authors: 

Given today's world situation, further acts of terrorism both here and abroad, war crimes, torture, disappearances, imprisonment, hostage-taking and other scenarios are all possibilities that, while awful to think about, historically have accompanied many violent confrontations and wars. The United States has the best civil justice system in the world for dealing with these kinds of atrocities, war crimes and human rights violations.

July 01, 2008

Op-Ed begs question, "Is the Mississippi Supreme Court a 'rubber stamp' for powerful corporate entities?"

Cross posted from ThePopTort.com by John Guyette

According to the author, Alex A. Alston, Jr., the answer is yes!  And this from an unlikely source - a corporate defense attorney.  Alston, who has been a corporate defense attorney for over 40 years, wrote a wonderfully poignant op-ed about the court's overwhelmingly lopsided number of decisions in favor of corporations.  Alston's op-ed, which recently appeared in a Mississippi newspaper, The Clarion Ledger, noted that over the past four and a half years, "a plaintiff's success rate in reversing a jury verdict for the defendant is an astonishing zero." Talk about an un-level playing field.  Alston goes on to say that all we need to do is follow the money trail to find out why justices have be so pro-corporation in Mississippi:

How can it be that during the last 4 1/2 years powerful corporations, hospitals, and insurance companies have prevailed in the state Supreme Court in nearly every case? Can an injured plaintiff ever be right?

Perhaps it is because we elect our Supreme Court justices. In the 2002 election, insurance companies, large corporations, and doctors poured millions of dollars into the campaign coffers of most of the justices. One of the new judges that year alone received over a million dollars from these sources...

Probably the best indication of how a Supreme Court justice will rule is the source of the political contributions he or she receives...

If powerful corporations and insurance companies have financed a justice's campaign, you would not be far off in guessing that his or her rulings will most likely be in favor of his donors.

For the full op-ed click here.

June 30, 2008

Federal Agencies letting manufacturers off the hook

With special interest and big business spending millions of dollars lobbying to take away the courts from consumers - you would think that federal agencies should do their part to protect consumers and hold wrongdoers accountable.  But if you thought this... you would be WRONG.  Unfortunately, as this Chicago Tribune article points out, federal agencies, under the Bush Administration, are being criticized for doing their fair share of screwing over consumers and protecting their Fat Cat friends.  These agencies are "rule making" people out of the right to hold wrongdoers accountable in the civil justice system, by making it tougher (or in some cases impossible) to bring suit against a manufacturer if the product was approved by a federal agency.

As Joan Claybrook, a former head of National Highway Traffic Safety Administration who now runs Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group, put it:

"Liability puts a burden [on companies] to be very careful ... and not cut corners,"... "Without that, manufacturers will literally get away with murder."

When she ran NHTSA, Claybrook said, the agency did not try to regulate for every situation. Instead, she said, it assumed companies also did their own testing to ensure the safety of their products. If they didn't, they could pay the price in court.

"Federal standards are not all-encompassing," she said. "Liability fills the gaps."

Even though these rules are bad, Congress has the power to step in and pass laws preventing these agencies from cutting off consumers from the courts. It is unlikely that this administration would sign them, since they were the ones prodding these agencies to make these awful rules in the first place.  Let's hope that Congress and the new administration (whomever it will be) acts to prevent manufacturers from getting away with murder. 

To read more about this issue click here.

June 27, 2008

Milwaukee Crime Victim Relies on Civil Court for Justice

Crime victims can use the civil court system to seek justice, even if their perpetrator isn't criminally prosecuted.  An 85-year-old woman in nearby Waukesha County was beaten and robbed in a home invasion.  She says she can identify one of the attackers, but authorities are unlikely to file criminal charges against him.  That didn’t stop a civil court judge from ordering the man to pay her $3 million in punitive damages, suffering, and money to buy an alarm system for her home.

June 25, 2008

Supreme Court Reduces Punitive Damages to 1/10th of What the Jury Thought Was Fair for the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill

Cross posted from The Pop Tort by Amanda

Right now the folks at Exxon Mobile are probably writing out their 'Thank You' cards to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.  Even though the company posted a "disappointing" $10.9 billion profit in the first quarter of 2008 (the second highest U.S. corporate profit ever – the highest being themselves in 2007) the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that the company only has to pay $500 million (nope, I didn't forget a zero) in punitive damages to the 30,000 victims of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.

Okay, so in 1994, when a jury in Alaska awarded the victims $5 billion, the punitive damages award really might have punished the company for causing this disaster.  In 1994, $5 billion represented a year's profits for the oil company.  In 2006, the award was cut down to $2.5 billion and only represented "about three weeks of Exxon's current [2006] net profits."  So, the current $500 million damage award is what?  Well, according to the New York Times, Exxon Mobile earned more than $1,287 of profit for every second of 2007.

At that rate, it only took them four and a half days to pay off this court's punitive damages judgment.

Madigan Strikes Another Blow to Countrywide

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan files a lawsuit today against Countrywide Financial, the nation's biggest mortgage lender.

"Unfair and deceptive advertising, marketing and sales practices were utilized to push mortgages, while hiding the real costs and risks to borrowers, including enticing borrowers with low teaser rates, low monthly payments and 'no closing cost' loans that failed to make clear and conspicuous," according to the lawsuit, which also names Countrywide Chairman and Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo as a defendant.

Among other things, Madigan wants Countrywide to pay restitution to all affected consumers who lost their homes or loans. She also asks for 90 days to review any loans that are in or near foreclosure to see if borrowers can pursue affordable options.

Madigan has long had her eye on Countrywide, even going beyond allegations of mere corruption to accuse them of racial discrimination.  This lawsuit just adds to her reputation as one of our most important consumer watchdogs.  It could also be a big deal for Illinois consumers, if it goes our way.  So far, the government hasn't done enough to aid struggling homeowners.  Let's hope the Office of the AG gets the job done for everyone who has been scammed by Mozilo's Countrywide.

June 24, 2008

Woman Claims Retaliation for Reporting Medication Errors

Here is a situation I've never come across:
Back in my home state of Iowa, an innocent woman was jailed, cited for assault of her own mother, and denied visitation rights to her mother’s nursing home for thirteen months—all on false pretenses.  She says she was falsely accused by a nursing home worker, because she complained about medication errors and poor care at the home—a home that was cited for “medication errors and problems with nursing services” just last year.

June 23, 2008

Casualties of Tort War: Consumers

Cross posted from The Pop Tort by John Guyette

CourthousekeyholeWith few exceptions, like Stephanie Mencimer’s piece in the Washington Monthly a few years ago, the media have a terrible tendency to spit back talking points provided to them by corporate groups and to talk about so-called “tort reform” like the whole thing is just a money battle between lobbyists – instead of dealing with the constitutional rights that are at stake or the impact on average people of weakening this system, not to mention our health and safety as a nation. 

The New York Times sometimes stood apart from this and actually used to challenge industry groups that orchestrated this so-called “tort reform” movement to serve their rich and powerful corporate members, many of whom have been found liable for egregious misconduct. (See here or here)

But no more.

Yesterday the Times ran a lengthy article entitled, "To the Trenches - The Tort War Is Raging On," citing without comment brazenly-biased and bogus corporate surveys and insurance industry consultant “reports” that have been widely trashed (for instance here, here and here), and making it seem like the only people affected by laws that take away rights of injured consumers are the attorneys who represent them, or to the extent attorneys are affected, the only thing they care about are their fees.  What an outrage.

Here's what goes on in the life of most trial lawyers: A legitimately injured person walks into their office.  The attorney looks into it and makes an offer to an insurance company, usually forced to leave a message on voice mail.  What happens?  Nothing.  No one even calls back. Welcome to the world of most trial lawyers. That’s why they are forced to file most cases, as insurance companies drag out these cases to egregious lengths.  Where is that scenario described?

(It should be noted that the Center for Justice & Democracy twice asked to speak to this Times reporter and was blown off, receiving not so much as a courteous “no thanks” to two emails.  That’s a first.)

From the story:

In a Washington ballroom bedecked with flags honoring explorers who overcame oceans and mountains to pursue international trade, Thomas J. Donohue congratulated the assembled modern merchants — a group of executives, lobbyists and lawyers — for challenging a more mundane adversary.

"It took guts, bravery and vision to get behind what must have seemed like an insurmountable task — taking on the powerful trial bar," said Mr. Donohue, the chief executive of the United States Chamber of Commerce. "We have succeeded beyond our expectations."

Yes "a group of executives, lobbyists and lawyers" sitting around congratulating themselves for limiting the rights of catastrophically-injured children truly does take "guts" and "bravery."

The story goes on to paint a picture of uncertainty as to who the winners and losers are in the tort war, once again leaving average consumers out of it.

Hello, where are the normal everyday people in all of this?  We're over here! Hello?

June 20, 2008

Mortgage Fraud Crackdown Hits Home

Finally, more is being done to track down mortgage insiders responsible for defrauding the public of millions.  The Justice Department just unveiled the perfectly-named Operation Malicious Mortgage, an effort which targets perpetrators of crimes as wide-ranging as bankruptcy fraud, foreclosure rescue scams, identity theft, and falsified loan applications and real estate appraisals.  Here in Illinois, authorities arrested 67.

In Chicago, authorities said the centerpiece of their investigation involved one of the largest mortgage fraud schemes ever prosecuted in federal court here.

The ring run by Bobbie L. Brown Jr. fraudulently obtained loans on some 183 homes in Illinois, Nevada and California, authorities said, and lenders lost more than $24 million.

In several instances, Brown allegedly bought homes using stolen Social Security numbers. In other cases, Brown and his co-defendants used straw purchasers to buy homes, gaining the straw purchasers' cooperation with promises of "no money down" and "cash back at closing," according to the charges.

Brown and others allegedly told the straw purchasers that they did not have to make any mortgage payments and that the homes would be rented out. Instead, federal authorities said, Brown, several co-defendants and their friends and relatives moved into the homes and didn't make payments.

"These fraudulent loan packages overstate income, they overstate assets," said Gary Shapiro, first assistant U.S. attorney in Chicago. " They had phony tax returns in them prepared by their cooperating tax accountant. The defendants supplied the down payments for these loans and falsely verified in the loan applications that the borrowers who were allegedly purchasing these homes were making the down payments."

God knows there are more than 67 of these scam artists out there, so let's hope we see more of this accountability.

June 19, 2008

Chevron CEO Talks Gas Prices

Remember how a while back, when gas in Chicago was only $4 per gallon, Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson appeared on TV talking about Big Oil’s (non)role in curbing rising gas prices?  Chevron’s chief oilman did the same thing with Wolf Blitzer the other day.  He sounded a lot like Tillerson.  (Watch the clip here)  Consumers are getting fed up with Big Oil's misleading solutions to this crisis, especially when they come from an industry that has such an impact on our daily decisions.  Whatever happened to corporate social responsibility?

June 18, 2008

Strong Reactions to Marion VA Mismanagement

Here's an update on the Marion VA medical center that was scourged by reports of poor care and abuse.  The VA just released another report on wrongdoing at the hospital, this one about poor management (the first one dealt with actual medical care).  As The Southern reports, Illinois' federal lawmakers are sounding off.

Democratic Sens. Dick Durbin of Springfield and Barack Obama of Chicago made a joint statement.

"This new report from the VA confirms many of our suspicions about the problem that existed at the Marion VA Medical Center," they said. "The report paints a disturbing picture - a management culture that compounded problems at the facility; management at the regional level that did not serve as a quality check on the Marion facility; and no way for employees to complain or make meaningful suggestions about problems when they arose."

The senators said, "Our veterans and their families have made incredible sacrifices for this country, and when they return home, we owe them access to the best health care. Today's report proves that this was not the case at the VA medical facility in Marion."

People are rightly suspicious of how serious legislators are about seeing improvements and holding people accountable.  Like this reader, who recently commented on one of our posts.  Illinois congressional delegates meet with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs this week, so we shall see what comes of it.  In the meantime, we can hope that the widows of victims, who are seeking redress through the civil justice system, force accountability themselves.

Thanks to John Homan for helpful correspondence

June 16, 2008

Imprisoned Hero Finally Compensated

Back in 2002, Rachelle Jackson, a Chicago nurse, rescued a police officer from a burning car.  Now, six years later, Ms. Jackson has won a lawsuit against the city and the police officer for false arrest, coercive questioning, malicious prosecution, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.  How was such a hero ever treated so poorly, you ask?  Here's the story:

On November 19, 2002,    Rachelle Jackson heard twisting metal and ran to aid the occupants of a Chicago Police vehicle that had been in a car crash.    The car caught fire, but Rachelle rescued Chicago Police Officer Kelly Brogan from the car anyway. Many residents responded    to aid the officers. During the chaos, someone stole the service weapon of Officer Brogan's partner, who lay slumped over    the steering wheel unconscious. Rachelle went to the police station to be a witness.

Once there, officers subjected    Rachelle to over fifty hours of coercive and abusive interrogation, without access to a bathroom. Days later, Officer Kelly    Brogan, who Rachelle rescued, came forward with a lie that Rachelle Jackson had attempted to remove her star and steal her    gun; Rachelle claimed she pulled the officer from the burning car. After over ten months in jail, Cook County Circuit Court    Judge Schultz exonerated Rachelle of wrongdoing, just as the federal jury did yesterday. The eyewitnesses, except for Officer    Brogan, all corroborated Rachelle's story.

Finally this officer faces accountability.  We applaud Ms. Jackson for her heroic efforts.  Read her story in the Tribune.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search

  • Google Search
    Google

    WWW
    illinoisdeservesthetruth.org

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Add to My AOL

  • Economic  Activism Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

  • All opinions expressed on this blog are those of the authors only. Any disputes should be addressed to the authors or commentators. Illinois Deserves the Truth invites comment to further the debate on issues addressed, but we reserve the right to deny or remove any post or comment.
Blog powered by TypePad